Lack of a clear job descriptions and defined chain of command. The
less clear it is what your job is or what roles you are to play, the more
stress you will experience at work. Without clear job descriptions, a pastor
or church worker could spend days or weeks, doing what they think they have
been called to do, and find out later that no-one in the church cares, or
that leadership is opposed to what they are doing. Or they may be asked to
perform certain tasks to only find out that others are opposed to those
tasks being performed. There will even be times when two different people
are working on the same things, because they thought it was their
responsibility, and another thought it was theirs. Who calls the shots—the
board?, the elders?, the assembly?, the pastor?, a leadership team? Who is
responsible for what? These things must be clarified and understood. The
clearer it is, the less stress that will be experienced by all involved. As
we talked about in the chapter of church governance, the clearer the
authority lines are, and what each person’s responsibilities are, the
smoother things will go when problems and challenges arise.
Lack of empowerment. The worst scenario is heavy responsibilities
with no authority or decision making discretion. This combination has been
proven to be a key factor in the development of cardiovascular disorders as
well as contributing to many other physical and mental problems.
“Over the last number of years, a new model of job stress developed
by Robert Karasek , has highlighted two key elements of job stress that has
been supported by a growing body of evidence. Karasek's "job
strain" model states that the greatest risk to physical and mental
health from stress occurs to workers facing high psychological workload
demands or pressures combined with low control or decision latitude in
meeting those demands. Job demands are defined by questions such as
"working very fast," "working very hard," and not
"enough time to get the job done. Job decision latitude is defined as
both the ability to use skills on the job and the decision-making authority
available to the worker.”
“Lack of control over work, the work place, and employment status
have been identified both as sources of stress and as a critical health risk
for some workers. Employees who are unable to exert control over their lives
at work are more likely to experience work stress and are therefore more
likely to have impaired health (see Sutton & Kahn, 1984, for a review,
and Sauter et al., 1989). Many studies have found that heavy job demand, and
low control, or decreased decision latitude lead to job dissatisfaction,
mental strain, and cardiovascular disease.” (Eric Digest– Stress in the
Workplace)
The authority and ability to get the job done, must be proportional to
the expectations of the job. There is probably nothing more frustrating,
than having expectations to accomplishing certain tasks, and not having
authority to utilize the resources that are needed to complete the task.
Knowing what needs to be done to reach the goal, but having to always ask
permission, or fight for resources can drive a person to either despair, or
anger. Both of these responses reinforced over time, are detrimental to
health. Expectations, without the decision making ability to get the job
done, may be the greatest causes of stress in the church. This will be
particularly true for the driven, type A individual, who is focused
continually on getting to the goal, but is blocked or frustrated, and feels
out of control. Continually having to ask permission for every aspects of
the job, exasperates and wastes precious time. The role of church
leadership, particularly that of pastor/teacher, is to equip and empower the
saints for the work of the ministry (Eph 4:11-15 ). That means to aid a
person in discovering their spiritual gifting and passions for ministry,
giving them the tools and training to reach out in ministry, and then give
them their God-given authority and responsibility to get the job done within
a clear framework of accountability.
Inability to influence decision making (powerlessness). A person
needs to feel in control of their own job and the things that impact upon
it. Feeling powerless to control ones own career places undue continual
stress upon staff.
Lack of feedback and support. There must be feedback by those with
appropriate authority as to “how am I doing?” Not knowing if people are
pleased or not; not knowing if you are doing the right things or not; not
knowing if the rug is going to pulled out or not…. This uncertainty is
stressful. It is the responsibility of church leadership to provide
appropriate feedback to the senior pastor, and make sure that he is doing
the same for the staff and key leadership in the church. There must be
recognition for a job well done—that will go a long way in relieving
stress on the job. There must be a sense of job security, and the sense that
a job done well will be rewarded.
Frequent clashes with superiors. Whenever there is a clash of values
in the workplace there will be tension. I have observed first hand how a
mismatch between a pastors values and that of the church’s staff and
members caused continual, almost daily conflict between the pastor and the
staff and other leadership. Unfortunately those who work most closely with
the conflicted individual will experience the most stress. Fighting
unnecessary battles over and over again is very destructive to emotional
health.
Bullying. If there is any form of spiritual abuse occurring in the
church, you can be sure that there is also bullying going on. If the abuser
is the pastor, you can count on the staff being bullied if they do not
meekly go along with all that is asked of them. Working with a bully is
extremely toxic. It gets to the point that even the prospect of going to
work, or the thought or sound of the bully approaching immediately activates
the stress response, but fighting or flight are both inappropriate. Long
range the negative effects of being bullied are disastrous.
“With bullying, the injury is caused by an accumulation of small
events rather than one major event. The related diagnosis of Prolonged
Duress Stress Disorder (PDSD, which is PTSD over time) may be more
appropriate. However, whereas PTSD is in DSM-IV, PDSD is not - yet. PDSD, or
Complex PTSD as it is now becoming known, is a more appropriate diagnosis
for people who experience distressing events every day, such as the
emergency services (eg fire, ambulance and police officers etc), as well as
those in abuse situations.”
The effects of working with a bona-fide narcissist can also produce the
same PTSD/PDSD effects if a staff member is trying to protect the church
from the narcissist. Sort of like trying to hold their thumb in the dike
forever. Bully or narcissist, whenever a staff member begins to dread
contact with another staff member or the pastor, something must be done to
alleviate the situation.
No place to voice complaints. After a stroke brought on by a couple
of years of high stress working in a church, a lady was asked by her doctor
about where she worked that she would be under such stress. “In a church,”
she replied. “Oh, that explains it,” he said. “ That’s the worst!
Who do you complain to, when the pastor is your boss? No-one right?”
Having an outlet is critical. The church must have in place a number of
critical processes—1. Outside resource people for the staff to talk to
about problems. 2. A proper grievance and dispute resolution. 3. Competent
and gifted intercessors that each staff person has uplifting them in prayer.
These are discussed elsewhere in this book.
Lack of understanding/caring leadership. The chapter on narcissism in
the pulpit describes the apex of uncaring leadership—but uncaring
leadership in any form is destructive and stressful. Without agape love
everything becomes useless ( 1 Corinthians 13).
Excess expectations and overly long work hours. An unbalanced life
eventually crashes. Unfortunately church workers can have so many
expectations that they begin to work longer and longer hours. It is the
responsibility of church leadership to make sure the pastor maintains
balance, and that he is ensuring that the rest of the staff is doing the
same. Proper boundaries need to be encouraged for everyone. Check if staff
are having to take work home with them, or if they are having to put in
overtime to get the job done. If either are the case there is a problem.
Inadequate time to complete tasks to personal standards or to the
standards of a perfectionist pastor. The height of this will again be
evidenced in working for the narcissists, particularly as they continually
provide double messages to their staff. Things like—”everything must be
done with excellence,” with you shouldn’t spend so much time on those
same tasks.” Take for example a church secretary whose responsibility it
was to produce an excellent, error free bulletin every Sunday—each week
should would meticulously work on the bulletin, checking it over and over
for mistakes (even taking it home) and then submit it to the pastor for his
approval and checking. Each week he would give it back saying it was just
fine, but almost every Monday he would complain about all the mistakes made,
even the pettiest of details. When confronted by another staff person, he
responded, “Oh I never check it over the first time. I enjoy finding the
mistakes later after it is printed, and then pointing them out.” How much
stress do you think that secretary endures in that one area of her job
alone? It it behoves church leadership to ensure that staff has a place to
voice their concerns about this sort of thing, and that systems and
structures are in place to correct abuses.
Unremitting and prolonged pressures. Continual demands to accomplish
more, do it better etc. will eventually wear the strongest person out,
particularly the overly responsible. Again, feedback mechanisms and channels
need to be in place.
Confusion caused by conflicting demands. This can be caused by either
bad leadership or by confused authority lines. A narcissist will always
bring about the former, but any leader who changes his/her mind often and
does not have a clear sense of vision and direction can change expectations
often enough to cause adverse stress. Confusion over multiple authority
lines also is destructive. Examples could be— a staff member receiving
differing instructions by 2 superiors (ie.—the office administrator
instructs secretarial staff to do certain things, and the pastor instructs
them to do differing things); or a pastor is instructed by the elders to
follow one course of action, and the board of directors requests another.
Unresolved prolonged conflict. Conflict is often endemic in the
church, and staff can get caught up in the sides and issues, and will almost
always be effected by that it. In the simplest form the conflict may involve
just 2 church members or families, but the continual hearing of the
complaints one against the other, and the lobbying for support continually
brings irritation to pastors and staff. Failure to resolve issues will
ensure that they rear their ugly heads over and over again. A culture of
avoidance often ensures that eventually an explosion results. It is
imperative that the church leadership has proper grievance and conflict
policies in place, and that trained leaders can provide mediation and
arbitration when necessary. Often the pastor and staff will be the object of
conflict and this makes resolution all the more critical. Utilizing avenues
of outside resources can prove extremely useful at these times, particularly
if the conflict is between pastor and staff, or pastor and board/or elders.)
Conflict can become church wide if there are conflicting values between
the pastor and the congregation. The Alban Institute writes:
“Churches are voluntary religious associations. Their stability
depends in equal parts upon consensus about the vision and purposes of the
congregation and upon the satisfaction members get from participation.
Consensus refers to an agreed-on set of values, norms, perceptions and
behaviors that make up the portrait of that particular church. This network
of beliefs and behaviors is in every church.
“Subjectively, it supports the credibility of important notions about
life's meaning and the place its members occupy in the world. These notions
continue to feel valid and right because in large measure other members
continue to uphold them.
“Any threat to the consensus predictably floods the congregation with
tension, a mixture of fear and excitement, leading to a crisis.
“To achieve inclusion, the pastor must be perceived as one who values
the existing consensus, and yet one who has earned the right to test its
adequacy and play a part in changing its nature. He must be recognized as a
trusted person, capable of giving and receiving straight talk.” (Reprinted
from Stress, Power, and Money by J.C. Harris, by permission of the Alban
Institute, Inc., 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1250W, Bethesda, Maryland
20814-3211. Copyright © . All rights reserved.)
Prejudice regarding your age, gender, sexuality, race, or ethnicity.
Prejudice needs to be dealt with quickly and met with firm resolve. The most
common form of prejudice observed in the church will be around male/female
differences. There are still strongly held notions that leadership in the
church is to be male only. Often you will see female staff being paid less
than male staff, but accomplishing more. Authority will often be restricted
from the fairer sex, and artificial lids kept on them denying specific roles
and responsibilities. I would strongly encourage church leadership to study
up on ‘women in leadership’ in the church. My own studies, and the
teaching of the same revolutionized my own views. Way too much culture and
bad exegesis has been brought to bear on scriptural interpretation. There is
a lot of very good writing and solid exegesis clarifying some of the problem
texts of the new testament available, and I would encourage its study. (see
the appendix for a list of resources)
Uncomfortable workplace. Adverse temperatures, poor lighting etc. I
know of one church in which the pastor continually turned the thermostat
down to 60 degrees in the summer and left his windows open in the winter
time. The rest of the office staff would have to wear sweaters in the summer
and run heaters in their offices to be comfortable. In an office of 6 it was
clear that 1 person had a problem, but he was a narcissist and the boss and
couldn’t have cared less about the others.
Unrealistically high self-expectations (perfectionism) A person can
become his/her own worst enemy when it comes to stress. Personalities that
focus on attaining perfection, or being the savour of the church, will
experience stress and may eventually suffer burnout. This is particularly
exasperated for type A individuals.
Poor communication (skills or processes). Bad communication or
continual disruption of clear communication leads to all sort of unnecessary
problems. Often poor communication is a result of bad authority and poor
accountability structures. Sometimes it is just the result of bad leadership
and administration.